fipr.org Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the fipr.org

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host fipr.org. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is The Bunker Secure Hosting Ltd .

the related websites

profjimnorton.com cisco.com cl.cam.ac.uk cipr.co.uk crugroup.com publications.parliament.uk fipra.com nhs.uk telegraph.co.uk crickweb.co.uk premierbodyshops.co.uk dailymail.co.uk theorganicpharmacy.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

foundation for information policy research > home > about > policy work > achievements > friends of fipr > events > contact fipr welcome the foundation for information policy research is an independent body that studies the interaction between information technology and society. its goal is to identify technical developments with significant social impact, commission and undertake research into public policy alternatives, and promote public understanding and dialogue between technologists and policy-makers in the uk and europe. hot topics: [ surveillance ][ copyright ][ e-democracy ][ health privacy ] announcements standardisation and certification of safety, security and privacy in the 'internet of things' 21 september 2017 fipr has written a report for the european union joint research commission which considers what will happen to safety regulation once computers are embedded invisibly everywhere. the eu already regulates many aspects of the safety of vehicles, medical devices, electrical equipment, domestic appliances and even toys. as these devices and systems are recruited to 'the internet of things', their vulnerabilities (whether old or new) may be remotely exploited, with consequent risks. many regulators who previously thought only in terms of safety will have to start thinking of security as well. the original report is available on the eu publications site here and an academic paper summarising the results, which was presented at weis 2017 is available here . measuring the effectiveness of website takedowns 12 june 2015 fipr has written a report for the uk home office which examines the effectiveness of website takedown. takedown has been used to disrupt criminal activities for well over a decade. yet little is known about its overall effectiveness, particularly as many websites can be replaced rapidly and at little cost. we conducted lengthy interviews with a range of people actively engaged in website takedown, including commercial companies that offer specialist services, organisations targeted by criminals, uk law enforcement and service providers who respond to takedown requests. we found that law enforcement agencies are far less effective at takedown than commercial firms, who get an awful lot more practice. we conclude that the police must either raise their game, or subcontract the process. an academic paper summarising the report was presented at apwg ecrime 2016, and is available here . the next national security strategy 10 february 2015 the uk parliament's joint committee on the national security strategy has now published their report on " the next national security strategy ". fipr's written submission can be read here . a report by the bureau of investigative journalists discussing just one small aspect of our evidence is here . consultation response: 'speaker's commission on digital democracy' 23 september 2014 fipr has responded to the speaker's commission on digital democracy. allowing votes to be cast remotely from pcs and phones may seem an attractive way to make voting easier and increase turnout - goals that everyone can support. electronic voting has for some years been used routinely by the electoral reform society and others for many low-stakes elections, such as to the leadership of professional bodies. however this technology still has very significant issues with security, privacy, coercion resistance, auditability and comprehensibility, which preclude its use in high-stakes contests where capable and well-resourced actors (political parties, lobby groups and even foreign governments) may have an incentive to manipulate the system. in our view, the adoption of online voting technology would present extremely grave challenges to the integrity of uk elections, and risk disadvantaging significant sections of the population., which would present a real danger of undermining public confidence in democracy rather than strengthening it as the commission rightly seeks to do. finally, people who oppose the use of new technology for well-established activities are sometimes accused of being luddites and of letting their ignorance stand in the way of perfectly acceptable change. in the case of e-voting, we believe that the more familiar people are with the technology, the more they understand the very substantial risks that it poses to the democratic process. it is ignorance that leads people to suppose that e-voting is risk-free and desirable; and it is technical experts such as ourselves (and our colleagues whose carefully-argued papers we have cited) who are cautioning against embracing evoting for the foreseeable future. the full consultation response from fipr can be read here . for more on the speaker's commission see: here . consultation response: 'ico draft anonymisation code of practice' 23 august 2012 fipr has responded to the information commissioner who was consulting on a draft anonymisation code of practice. in our view, the code is not balanced, or even honest. it tries to market anonymisation as a cure-all for privacy problems, ignoring the relevant science and engineering. in fact the code is so far from what's needed that we recommend that the commissioner should abandon it. the ico has never had adequate technical expertise and is simply not able to undertake exercises of this kind. as just one example of its failings, the code's explanation of anonymisation is totally inadequate. it fails to communicate even the basics of security engineering let alone the subtleties of the underlying computer science. it may convince the untutored reader that they can make private data fit for release by choosing from among a few technical tweaks described in an appendex; it fails to emphasise that this is a complex engineering problem for which high-quality professional advice is necessary. the full consultation response from fipr can be read here , and ross anderson has also written (29 aug 2012) an opinion article for the guardian newspaper. for the ico draft code see here and the ico consultation document see here . additionally : fipr is today publishing the response sent in october 2011 to the cabinet office consultation on ' making open data real '. that response made similar points about the very substantial difficulties in anonymising data. the official summary of the consultation results mentions privacy a number of times and did at least understand that there was an issue here saying "there was a sense that the potential for deanonymisation (or 'jigsaw' reidentification) is an issue which government is yet to address and one that will become more pressing as the open data agenda evolves." as the recent consultation response makes quite clear -- the ico has failed to address it either. consultation response: 'an information revolution' 12 january 2011 fipr has responded to the department of health consultation on their proposals for a new it strategy for the nhs. in our view, the strategy is 80% correct, and the bulk of the response outlines potential traps along the road to implementation. in order to demonstrate how little has changed since 1997, we are also publishing (with the permission of all of its authors) a briefing paper written for the then incoming labour government. its advice remains valid today, because little heed was paid to it by the previous administration -- causing significant opportunity costs to health in britain; centralised mismanagement has done serious damage to britain's healthcare it industry, which hopefully can now start to regain its former world-leading position. for the original consultation document see here ; for fipr's consultation response see here , and for the 1997 briefing document, see here . nhs scr project should be abandoned 17 june 2010 today the department of health launches the long-awaited report by professor trisha greenhalgh into the summary care record (scr). this report, whose contents have been widely trailed and leaked ( see tony

URL analysis for fipr.org

https://www.fipr.org/press/051004ipred.html
https://www.fipr.org/terrorismdetention.pdf
https://www.fipr.org/nhs-optout.pdf
https://www.fipr.org/press/080423phorm.html
https://www.fipr.org/policy.html
https://www.fipr.org/090714rip.pdf
http://www.fipr.org/press/040426id.html
https://www.fipr.org/140923digitaldemocracy.pdf
https://www.fipr.org/080423holetter.pdf
https://www.fipr.org/080317icoletter.html
https://www.fipr.org/090808dna.pdf
http://www.fipr.org/copyright/eucd_intro.html
https://www.fipr.org/100110smartmeters.pdf
http://www.fipr.org/press/031030register.html
https://www.fipr.org/birthday10.html
paymentscouncil.org.uk
ico.gov.uk
publications.parliament.uk
ofgem.gov.uk
parliament.uk
jrrt.org.uk
society.guardian.co.uk
thehuntreview.org.uk
judiciary.gov.uk
govtalk.gov.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

WHOIS LIMIT EXCEEDED - SEE WWW.PIR.ORG/WHOIS FOR DETAILS

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS fipr.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

  REGISTERED unknown

DOMAIN

  NAME fipr.org

NSERVER

  NS2.GRADWELLCLOUD.COM 109.224.233.88

  NS1.GRADWELLCLOUD.COM 109.224.233.83

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .